ஜர்னல் ஆஃப் நியூட்ரிஷன் அண்ட் டயட்டிக்ஸ்

திறந்த அணுகல்

எங்கள் குழு ஒவ்வொரு ஆண்டும் அமெரிக்கா, ஐரோப்பா மற்றும் ஆசியா முழுவதும் 1000 அறிவியல் சங்கங்களின் ஆதரவுடன் 3000+ உலகளாவிய மாநாட்டுத் தொடர் நிகழ்வுகளை ஏற்பாடு செய்து 700+ திறந்த அணுகல் இதழ்களை வெளியிடுகிறது, இதில் 50000 க்கும் மேற்பட்ட தலைசிறந்த ஆளுமைகள், புகழ்பெற்ற விஞ்ஞானிகள் ஆசிரியர் குழு உறுப்பினர்களாக உள்ளனர்.

அதிக வாசகர்கள் மற்றும் மேற்கோள்களைப் பெறும் திறந்த அணுகல் இதழ்கள்

700 இதழ்கள் மற்றும் 15,000,000 வாசகர்கள் ஒவ்வொரு பத்திரிகையும் 25,000+ வாசகர்களைப் பெறுகிறது

குறியிடப்பட்டது
  • கூகுள் ஸ்காலர்
  • ICMJE
இந்தப் பக்கத்தைப் பகிரவும்

சுருக்கம்

A Wearable Device Provides an Alternate Measurement of Free-Living Eating Rate

Jacqueline Beatty, Geoffrey Greene and Kathleen Melanson

Eating rate, defined as the consumption of food per unit of time, has been associated with energy intake and obesity. However, eating rate is difficult to measure, necessitating most studies to rely on self-reported eating rate (SRER). The wrist-worn Eat Less Move More (ELMM) device has been validated to count bites by detection of a wrist-roll motion specific to eating, but has not yet been used to measure seconds between bites, as a proxy to eating rate, in free-living settings. We aimed to examine ELMM-assessed eating rate in free-living settings compared to SRER. This was a secondary analysis of the initial three days of seconds between bites data from an 8-week weight loss intervention. Participants (n=37; 62.2% female; age 36.5 ± 16.1 years; BMI 31.2 ± 3.5 kg/m2) ranked their SRER and tracked their eating in free-living settings by turning the ELMM on and off at start/end of meals. Based on baseline data, five SRER categories were collapsed into three groups: very slow/slow (n=5), medium (n=12), and fast/very fast (n=16). One-way ANOVA examined SRER group differences in average seconds between bites.There was a significant difference in seconds between bites among SRER groups (SBB, M ± SD: slow=25.5 ± 4.3, medium=21.0 ± 3.4, and fast=20.8 ± 3.0). Tukey tests showed lower average seconds between bites, indicating faster eating, in the fast SRER group compared to the slow SRER group. Lower average seconds between bites was seen in the medium SRER group compared to the slow SRER group, but there was no difference between the medium and fast SRER groups.The ELMM assessed average seconds between bites during eating occasions, and seconds between bites corresponded to SRER. Future work should assess eating rate with ELMM in larger samples and in other populations.