எங்கள் குழு ஒவ்வொரு ஆண்டும் அமெரிக்கா, ஐரோப்பா மற்றும் ஆசியா முழுவதும் 1000 அறிவியல் சங்கங்களின் ஆதரவுடன் 3000+ உலகளாவிய மாநாட்டுத் தொடர் நிகழ்வுகளை ஏற்பாடு செய்து 700+ திறந்த அணுகல் இதழ்களை வெளியிடுகிறது, இதில் 50000 க்கும் மேற்பட்ட தலைசிறந்த ஆளுமைகள், புகழ்பெற்ற விஞ்ஞானிகள் ஆசிரியர் குழு உறுப்பினர்களாக உள்ளனர்.
அதிக வாசகர்கள் மற்றும் மேற்கோள்களைப் பெறும் திறந்த அணுகல் இதழ்கள்
700 இதழ்கள் மற்றும் 15,000,000 வாசகர்கள் ஒவ்வொரு பத்திரிகையும் 25,000+ வாசகர்களைப் பெறுகிறது
Emma Heffernan, Margaret M Hannan, Maria Fitzgibbon
SARS-CoV-2 which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is still challenging health care systems and governments all over the world. Although molecular testing remains the most reliable laboratory method available for establishing active infection, serological tests can identify past infection and measure immune response in vaccinated individuals. Serological tests have a number of useful applications in the management and control of the COVID-19 pandemic including as indicators of past infection, an adjunct to molecular testing in certain clinical situations, the diagnosis of late presentation COVID-19, seroprevalence studies and in assessing the efficacy of vaccines in development and the follow-up and monitoring of vaccinated individuals. Initial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays which were qualitative and had different antigens as their target proteins have been revised to include the Spike (S) protein or the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) protein as their target antigens and have the potential to quantify the antibody response. These assay revisions will facilitate the quantification of specific antibody titre which will in turn enable the monitoring of antibody response in individuals over time and the response to different available vaccines. Serological assays designed to assess antibody response to vaccination should include a good correlation of antibody results with neutralizing activity and evidence suggests that S protein based immunoassays correlate better with neutralizing activity than Nucleocapsid (N) protein based assays. Studies comparing both the N and S protein based assays have shown an additional utility of serological assays in differentiating between a SARS-CoV-2 infected antibody response and a vaccine induced immune response. Additionally, quantitative antibody assays could play a role in a more targeted distribution of vaccines by assessing antibody levels after one dose of vaccine which will allow for wider vaccine coverage. Standardisation of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays is essential and the recent availability of an International Standard (IS) and International Reference Panel for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins will facilitate the future development and evaluation of serological assays. This will in turn help define protective levels of antibody and aid in the assessment of the efficacy and durability of antibody responses to the different vaccines available and in development.