எங்கள் குழு ஒவ்வொரு ஆண்டும் அமெரிக்கா, ஐரோப்பா மற்றும் ஆசியா முழுவதும் 1000 அறிவியல் சங்கங்களின் ஆதரவுடன் 3000+ உலகளாவிய மாநாட்டுத் தொடர் நிகழ்வுகளை ஏற்பாடு செய்து 700+ திறந்த அணுகல் இதழ்களை வெளியிடுகிறது, இதில் 50000 க்கும் மேற்பட்ட தலைசிறந்த ஆளுமைகள், புகழ்பெற்ற விஞ்ஞானிகள் ஆசிரியர் குழு உறுப்பினர்களாக உள்ளனர்.
அதிக வாசகர்கள் மற்றும் மேற்கோள்களைப் பெறும் திறந்த அணுகல் இதழ்கள்
700 இதழ்கள் மற்றும் 15,000,000 வாசகர்கள் ஒவ்வொரு பத்திரிகையும் 25,000+ வாசகர்களைப் பெறுகிறது
Arjun Prakash and Anoop K Koshy
Background and Aims Esophageal High Resolution Manometry (HRM) is widely employed for the diagnosis and evaluation of esophageal motor disorders. There is often a dichotomy between HRM findings and various clinicalcorrelates. We attempted to retrospectively evaluate the clinical profiles of patients with their clinical correlates to establish the role of HRM in evaluation of esophageal symptoms. Results Total of 235 patients were studied.Predominant symptoms were Dysphagia (70.6%), Non-cardiac Chest pain (8.5%) and reflux in 9%. Normal HRM was seen in 31.5%, minor motility disorders in 22.5%. Achalasia (61.1%) and Esophago-gastric (EGJ) outflow obstruction (11.1%) was considered as part of the Major disorders. Dysphagia was the most common symptom of which majority of patients had major motility disorders (93 patients (56%)). Normal HRM was seen in 41/166 patients (24.6%) with dysphagia and 68% in NCCP. Only 11% presenting with NCCP had major motility disorder. Half the patients with GERD had a normal HRM study (10/20 patients). On follow up, 78/93 patients (83.8%) were asymptomatic, of which, >50%had normal HRM. Among those with minor motility disorders (n=39), 33(84.6%) were asymptomatic at follow up. Conclusion The significance of HRM in assessment of symptoms other than dysphagia, with diagnosis within the Minor Motility disorders group and associated with benign outcomes, may be questioned. The diagnosis group of Minor Motility disorders, in itself, may be questioned in future Chicago classifications.